Thomas Hacker: raw computed results
The raw ranking from the production similarity calculation (face-embedding centroid cosine → gender-cohort z-normalization). The web-opinion crown, curation, and fusion re-rank are removed.
- 1
87.1%z 4.59 - 2
51.6%z 3.71 - 3
51.6%z 3.71 - 4
48.6%z 3.67 - 5
47.1%z 3.61 - 6
46.8%z 3.59 - 7
45.6%z 3.51 - 8
45.4%z 3.50 - 9
44.6%z 3.44 - 10
44.3%z 3.43 - 11
43.5%z 3.38 - 12
43.5%z 3.37 - 13
43.3%z 3.36 - 14
43.2%z 3.36 - 15
43%z 3.34 - 16
42.8%z 3.33 - 17
42.7%z 3.32 - 18
42.3%z 3.30 - 19
42.1%z 3.29 - 20
42%z 3.28 - 21
42%z 3.28 - 22
41.9%z 3.27 - 23
41.7%z 3.26 - 24
41%z 3.21 - 25
40.9%z 3.20 - 26
40.8%z 3.20 - 27
40.8%z 3.20 - 28
40.8%z 3.20 - 29
40.7%z 3.19 - 30
40.7%z 3.19 - 31
40.5%z 3.18 - 32
40.3%z 3.17 - 33
40%z 3.15 - 34
39.6%z 3.12 - 35
39.1%z 3.09 - 36
39.1%z 3.09 - 37
39%z 3.08 - 38
38.9%z 3.07 - 39
38.5%z 3.05 - 40
38.5%z 3.05 - 41
38.4%z 3.04 - 42
38.3%z 3.04 - 43
38.1%z 3.02 - 44
38%z 3.02 - 45
37.4%z 2.98 - 46
37.4%z 2.98 - 47
37%z 2.95 - 48
37%z 2.95 - 49
37%z 2.95 - 50
36.7%z 2.93