Thomas Akers: raw computed results
The raw ranking from the production similarity calculation (face-embedding centroid cosine → gender-cohort z-normalization). The web-opinion crown, curation, and fusion re-rank are removed.
- 1
85%z 4.42 - 2
83.6%z 4.31 - 3
81.3%z 4.12 - 4
80.8%z 4.08 - 5
72.8%z 3.94 - 6
72.4%z 3.93 - 7
66.4%z 3.87 - 8
66.2%z 3.87 - 9
50.3%z 3.69 - 10
49.8%z 3.69 - 11
47.4%z 3.63 - 12
46.9%z 3.59 - 13
46.9%z 3.59 - 14
46.6%z 3.58 - 15
46.4%z 3.56 - 16
46.4%z 3.56 - 17
46.3%z 3.55 - 18
45.9%z 3.53 - 19
45.7%z 3.51 - 20
45.6%z 3.51 - 21
45.3%z 3.49 - 22
44.5%z 3.44 - 23
44.4%z 3.43 - 24
44.2%z 3.42 - 25
43.9%z 3.40 - 26
43.5%z 3.38 - 27
43.4%z 3.37 - 28
43.4%z 3.37 - 29
41.9%z 3.27 - 30
41.8%z 3.26 - 31
41.6%z 3.25 - 32
41.2%z 3.23 - 33
41%z 3.21 - 34
41%z 3.21 - 35
40.9%z 3.21 - 36
40.7%z 3.19 - 37
40.7%z 3.19 - 38
40.6%z 3.19 - 39
40.3%z 3.17 - 40
40.2%z 3.16 - 41
40.2%z 3.16 - 42
39.9%z 3.14 - 43
39.9%z 3.14 - 44
39.8%z 3.14 - 45
39.3%z 3.10 - 46
39%z 3.09 - 47
38.8%z 3.07 - 48
38.8%z 3.07 - 49
38.6%z 3.06 - 50
38.5%z 3.05