Jim Dyck: raw computed results
The raw ranking from the production similarity calculation (face-embedding centroid cosine → gender-cohort z-normalization). The web-opinion crown, curation, and fusion re-rank are removed.
- 1
88.4%z 4.70 - 2
83.9%z 4.33 - 3
81.7%z 4.15 - 4
70.8%z 3.92 - 5
55.2%z 3.75 - 6
51.8%z 3.71 - 7
48.7%z 3.67 - 845.7%z 3.52
- 9
45.7%z 3.52 - 10
44.7%z 3.46 - 11
44.1%z 3.41 - 12
43.6%z 3.38 - 13
42.2%z 3.29 - 14
41.7%z 3.26 - 15
41.1%z 3.22 - 16
40.2%z 3.16 - 17
40.1%z 3.15 - 18
40%z 3.15 - 19
39.3%z 3.10 - 20
38.2%z 3.03 - 21
38.2%z 3.03 - 22
37.9%z 3.01 - 23
37.7%z 3.00 - 24
37.5%z 2.98 - 25
37.5%z 2.98 - 26
37.3%z 2.97 - 2737.2%z 2.96
- 28
36.9%z 2.95 - 29
36.7%z 2.94 - 30
36.6%z 2.93 - 31
36.2%z 2.90 - 32
36.2%z 2.90 - 33
36.1%z 2.89 - 34
35.9%z 2.88 - 35
35.9%z 2.88 - 36
35.7%z 2.87 - 37
35.6%z 2.86 - 38
35.6%z 2.86 - 39
35.5%z 2.86 - 40
35.5%z 2.86 - 41
35.4%z 2.85 - 42
35.3%z 2.84 - 43
35.2%z 2.84 - 44
34.8%z 2.81 - 45
34.7%z 2.81 - 46
34.7%z 2.80 - 47
34.5%z 2.79 - 48
34.5%z 2.79 - 49
34.3%z 2.78 - 50
34.3%z 2.78