Daniel Amen: raw computed results
The raw ranking from the production similarity calculation (face-embedding centroid cosine → gender-cohort z-normalization). The web-opinion crown, curation, and fusion re-rank are removed.
- 1
80.8%z 4.08 - 2
80.6%z 4.07 - 3
69.2%z 3.90 - 4
52.8%z 3.72 - 5
47.9%z 3.66 - 6
47.5%z 3.63 - 7
47%z 3.60 - 8
46.7%z 3.58 - 9
46.7%z 3.58 - 10
46.1%z 3.54 - 11
45.7%z 3.52 - 12
45.4%z 3.50 - 13
45%z 3.47 - 14
43.6%z 3.38 - 15
43.6%z 3.38 - 16
43.4%z 3.37 - 17
43.2%z 3.35 - 18
42.5%z 3.31 - 19
42.3%z 3.30 - 20
41.7%z 3.26 - 21
41.4%z 3.24 - 22
41.2%z 3.22 - 23
40.5%z 3.18 - 24
40.3%z 3.17 - 25
40.3%z 3.17 - 26
40.3%z 3.17 - 27
39.9%z 3.14 - 28
39.9%z 3.14 - 29
39.6%z 3.12 - 30
39.6%z 3.12 - 31
39.5%z 3.12 - 32
39.3%z 3.10 - 33
38.9%z 3.08 - 34
38.7%z 3.07 - 35
38.6%z 3.06 - 36
38.4%z 3.05 - 37
38.4%z 3.04 - 3838%z 3.02
- 39
38%z 3.02 - 40
38%z 3.02 - 41
37.8%z 3.00 - 42
37.5%z 2.99 - 43
37.4%z 2.98 - 44
37.4%z 2.98 - 45
37.2%z 2.97 - 46
36.9%z 2.95 - 47
36.9%z 2.95 - 48
36.8%z 2.94 - 49
36.7%z 2.93 - 50
36.4%z 2.92