Lars Hermel: raw computed results
The raw ranking from the production similarity calculation (face-embedding centroid cosine → gender-cohort z-normalization). The web-opinion crown, curation, and fusion re-rank are removed.
- 1
80.5%z 4.05 - 2
80.2%z 4.03 - 3
77.7%z 3.99 - 4
59.6%z 3.79 - 5
58.4%z 3.78 - 6
44.9%z 3.46 - 7
44.3%z 3.42 - 8
43.5%z 3.38 - 9
42.9%z 3.33 - 10
42.7%z 3.32 - 11
42.5%z 3.31 - 12
42.3%z 3.30 - 13
42.3%z 3.30 - 14
42%z 3.28 - 15
41.8%z 3.26 - 16
41.8%z 3.26 - 17
41.5%z 3.24 - 18
41.4%z 3.24 - 19
41%z 3.21 - 20
40.8%z 3.20 - 21
40.7%z 3.19 - 22
40.6%z 3.19 - 23
40.6%z 3.19 - 24
40%z 3.15 - 25
40%z 3.15 - 26
39.6%z 3.12 - 27
39.4%z 3.11 - 28
39.3%z 3.10 - 29
39.2%z 3.09 - 30
39%z 3.09 - 31
38.8%z 3.07 - 32
38.8%z 3.07 - 33
38.7%z 3.06 - 34
38.7%z 3.06 - 35
38.6%z 3.06 - 36
38.4%z 3.05 - 37
38.3%z 3.04 - 38
38%z 3.02 - 39
37.8%z 3.01 - 40
37.8%z 3.00 - 41
37.3%z 2.97 - 42
37.3%z 2.97 - 43
37.1%z 2.96 - 44
36.9%z 2.95 - 45
36.8%z 2.94 - 46
36.6%z 2.93 - 47
36.3%z 2.91 - 48
35.7%z 2.87 - 49
35.7%z 2.87 - 50
35.6%z 2.86