Luther Thomas: raw computed results
The raw ranking from the production similarity calculation (face-embedding centroid cosine → gender-cohort z-normalization). The web-opinion crown, curation, and fusion re-rank are removed.
- 1
99%z 8.31 - 2
51.2%z 3.70 - 3
45.3%z 3.49 - 4
44.4%z 3.43 - 5
44.1%z 3.41 - 6
43.4%z 3.37 - 7
42.6%z 3.31 - 8
42.3%z 3.30 - 9
42.2%z 3.29 - 10
42.1%z 3.29 - 11
40.5%z 3.18 - 12
40%z 3.15 - 13
39.5%z 3.12 - 14
39.5%z 3.11 - 15
38.8%z 3.07 - 16
38.6%z 3.05 - 17
38.1%z 3.03 - 18
37.9%z 3.01 - 19
37.7%z 3.00 - 2037.5%z 2.99
- 21
37.3%z 2.98 - 22
37.1%z 2.96 - 23
37%z 2.95 - 24
36.7%z 2.94 - 25
36.6%z 2.93 - 26
36.6%z 2.93 - 27
36.6%z 2.92 - 28
36.2%z 2.90 - 29
36.1%z 2.90 - 30
36.1%z 2.90 - 31
36.1%z 2.89 - 32
35.8%z 2.88 - 33
35.5%z 2.85 - 34
35.3%z 2.84 - 35
35.2%z 2.84 - 36
34.6%z 2.80 - 37
34.5%z 2.79 - 38
34.4%z 2.78 - 39
34.3%z 2.78 - 40
34.2%z 2.77 - 41
34.1%z 2.77 - 42
34%z 2.76 - 43
34%z 2.76 - 44
34%z 2.76 - 4533.7%z 2.74
- 46
33.6%z 2.73 - 47
33.6%z 2.73 - 48
33.6%z 2.73 - 49
33.1%z 2.70 - 50
33.1%z 2.70