Luke Armstrong: raw computed results
The raw ranking from the production similarity calculation (face-embedding centroid cosine → gender-cohort z-normalization). The web-opinion crown, curation, and fusion re-rank are removed.
- 1
91.6%z 5.14 - 2
84.1%z 4.35 - 3
79.1%z 4.01 - 4
46.9%z 3.60 - 5
46.7%z 3.58 - 6
45.2%z 3.48 - 7
43.9%z 3.40 - 8
42%z 3.28 - 9
41%z 3.21 - 10
40%z 3.15 - 11
39.9%z 3.14 - 12
39.9%z 3.14 - 13
39.2%z 3.10 - 14
38.6%z 3.05 - 15
38.3%z 3.04 - 16
38.1%z 3.03 - 17
38.1%z 3.02 - 18
37.5%z 2.99 - 19
37.5%z 2.99 - 20
37.4%z 2.98 - 21
37.3%z 2.97 - 22
37.1%z 2.96 - 23
37%z 2.96 - 24
36.7%z 2.93 - 25
36.5%z 2.92 - 26
35.9%z 2.88 - 27
35.9%z 2.88 - 28
35.7%z 2.87 - 29
35.2%z 2.84 - 30
35%z 2.82 - 31
34.8%z 2.81 - 32
34.4%z 2.78 - 33
34.4%z 2.78 - 34
34%z 2.76 - 35
33.6%z 2.74 - 36
33.3%z 2.72 - 37
33.1%z 2.70 - 38
33.1%z 2.70 - 39
32.8%z 2.68 - 40
32.7%z 2.68 - 41
32.5%z 2.66 - 42
32.4%z 2.66 - 43
32.4%z 2.66 - 44
32.2%z 2.64 - 45
32.2%z 2.64 - 46
32.1%z 2.64 - 47
32%z 2.63 - 48
32%z 2.63 - 49
32%z 2.63 - 50
32%z 2.63