Christian Titz: raw computed results
The raw ranking from the production similarity calculation (face-embedding centroid cosine → gender-cohort z-normalization). The web-opinion crown, curation, and fusion re-rank are removed.
- 1
82.2%z 4.20 - 2
82.2%z 4.20 - 3
82%z 4.18 - 4
66.3%z 3.87 - 5
50%z 3.69 - 6
45.5%z 3.50 - 7
44.8%z 3.46 - 8
44.3%z 3.43 - 9
43.5%z 3.38 - 10
43.4%z 3.37 - 11
43.3%z 3.37 - 12
42.4%z 3.31 - 13
41.3%z 3.23 - 14
40.9%z 3.20 - 15
40.2%z 3.16 - 16
40.1%z 3.16 - 17
40.1%z 3.15 - 18
39.9%z 3.14 - 19
39.8%z 3.14 - 20
39.7%z 3.13 - 21
38.8%z 3.07 - 22
38.5%z 3.05 - 23
38.2%z 3.03 - 24
37.7%z 3.00 - 25
37.7%z 3.00 - 26
37.7%z 3.00 - 27
37.6%z 3.00 - 28
37.5%z 2.99 - 29
37.5%z 2.99 - 30
37.3%z 2.97 - 31
37.2%z 2.97 - 32
37.1%z 2.96 - 33
37%z 2.96 - 34
37%z 2.95 - 35
36.8%z 2.94 - 36
36.8%z 2.94 - 37
36.7%z 2.94 - 38
36.1%z 2.90 - 39
36.1%z 2.89 - 40
35.9%z 2.88 - 41
35.8%z 2.88 - 42
35.7%z 2.87 - 43
35.4%z 2.85 - 44
35.3%z 2.85 - 45
35.1%z 2.83 - 46
35.1%z 2.83 - 47
34.7%z 2.81 - 48
34.7%z 2.80 - 49
34.3%z 2.78 - 50
34.2%z 2.77