Daniel Agger: raw computed results
The raw ranking from the production similarity calculation (face-embedding centroid cosine → gender-cohort z-normalization). The web-opinion crown, curation, and fusion re-rank are removed.
- 1
82.9%z 4.26 - 2
82.7%z 4.24 - 3
73.6%z 3.95 - 4
65.5%z 3.86 - 5
61.4%z 3.81 - 6
58.6%z 3.78 - 7
46.9%z 3.60 - 8
44.9%z 3.46 - 9
44.8%z 3.46 - 10
44.7%z 3.45 - 11
44.3%z 3.43 - 12
43.9%z 3.40 - 13
43.6%z 3.38 - 14
43.3%z 3.36 - 15
43%z 3.34 - 16
42.9%z 3.34 - 17
42.8%z 3.33 - 18
42.4%z 3.30 - 19
42.2%z 3.29 - 20
42.2%z 3.29 - 21
42.1%z 3.29 - 22
42%z 3.28 - 23
41.8%z 3.26 - 24
41.6%z 3.25 - 25
40.8%z 3.20 - 26
40.7%z 3.20 - 27
40.7%z 3.19 - 28
40.3%z 3.17 - 29
40.3%z 3.17 - 30
40.3%z 3.17 - 31
40.1%z 3.15 - 32
40%z 3.15 - 33
39.9%z 3.14 - 34
39.8%z 3.13 - 35
39.7%z 3.13 - 36
39.7%z 3.13 - 37
39.7%z 3.13 - 38
39.5%z 3.12 - 39
39.3%z 3.11 - 40
39.3%z 3.10 - 41
39.2%z 3.10 - 42
39.1%z 3.09 - 43
39.1%z 3.09 - 44
39.1%z 3.09 - 45
39%z 3.08 - 46
38.9%z 3.08 - 47
38.8%z 3.07 - 48
38.8%z 3.07 - 49
38.6%z 3.06 - 50
38.6%z 3.06