David Bamber: raw computed results
The raw ranking from the production similarity calculation (face-embedding centroid cosine → gender-cohort z-normalization). The web-opinion crown, curation, and fusion re-rank are removed.
- 1
83.4%z 4.29 - 2
69%z 3.90 - 3
56.5%z 3.76 - 4
54.2%z 3.73 - 5
53.8%z 3.73 - 6
53.6%z 3.73 - 7
50.2%z 3.69 - 8
50.1%z 3.69 - 9
47.9%z 3.66 - 10
47.7%z 3.65 - 11
47.4%z 3.63 - 12
47.2%z 3.62 - 13
46.7%z 3.58 - 14
46.7%z 3.58 - 15
46.3%z 3.56 - 16
46.2%z 3.55 - 1746.2%z 3.55
- 18
46%z 3.54 - 19
45.8%z 3.52 - 20
45.7%z 3.52 - 21
45.6%z 3.51 - 22
45%z 3.47 - 23
44.8%z 3.46 - 24
44.3%z 3.42 - 25
44%z 3.41 - 26
43.3%z 3.36 - 27
43.3%z 3.36 - 28
43%z 3.34 - 29
42.9%z 3.34 - 3042.4%z 3.30
- 31
42.2%z 3.29 - 32
42.2%z 3.29 - 33
42.1%z 3.28 - 34
41.9%z 3.27 - 35
41.6%z 3.25 - 36
41.5%z 3.25 - 37
41.5%z 3.24 - 38
41.2%z 3.22 - 39
40.9%z 3.21 - 40
40.9%z 3.20 - 41
40.8%z 3.20 - 42
40.7%z 3.19 - 4340.6%z 3.19
- 44
40.6%z 3.19 - 45
40.6%z 3.18 - 46
40.5%z 3.18 - 47
40.3%z 3.17 - 48
40.1%z 3.16 - 49
40.1%z 3.15 - 50
39.9%z 3.14