Sami Whitcomb: raw computed results
The raw ranking from the production similarity calculation (face-embedding centroid cosine → gender-cohort z-normalization). The web-opinion crown, curation, and fusion re-rank are removed.
- 1
72.2%z 3.93 - 2
69.1%z 3.90 - 3
68.2%z 3.89 - 4
59.2%z 3.79 - 5
52.3%z 3.71 - 6
50.3%z 3.69 - 7
50%z 3.69 - 8
47.6%z 3.64 - 9
46.4%z 3.56 - 10
45.6%z 3.51 - 11
45.4%z 3.50 - 12
45%z 3.47 - 13
44.8%z 3.46 - 14
44.8%z 3.46 - 15
44.1%z 3.41 - 16
43.4%z 3.37 - 17
43.3%z 3.36 - 18
43.1%z 3.35 - 19
42.9%z 3.34 - 20
42.9%z 3.34 - 21
42.9%z 3.34 - 22
42.3%z 3.30 - 23
42.1%z 3.29 - 24
42.1%z 3.28 - 25
41.9%z 3.27 - 26
41.9%z 3.27 - 27
41.5%z 3.24 - 28
41.4%z 3.24 - 29
41.2%z 3.23 - 30
41%z 3.22 - 31
40.9%z 3.20 - 32
40.8%z 3.20 - 33
40.7%z 3.20 - 34
40.6%z 3.19 - 35
40.6%z 3.18 - 36
40.5%z 3.18 - 37
40.5%z 3.18 - 38
40.5%z 3.18 - 39
40.2%z 3.16 - 40
40.1%z 3.16 - 41
40%z 3.15 - 42
39.9%z 3.14 - 43
39.5%z 3.11 - 44
39.3%z 3.10 - 45
39.3%z 3.10 - 46
39.2%z 3.10 - 47
39%z 3.08 - 48
38.9%z 3.08 - 49
38.5%z 3.05 - 50
38.5%z 3.05