Daniel Dahm: raw computed results
The raw ranking from the production similarity calculation (face-embedding centroid cosine → gender-cohort z-normalization). The web-opinion crown, curation, and fusion re-rank are removed.
- 1
89.2%z 4.77 - 2
82.7%z 4.24 - 3
82.2%z 4.20 - 4
81.5%z 4.14 - 5
78.6%z 4.00 - 6
71.7%z 3.93 - 7
71.7%z 3.93 - 8
69.7%z 3.90 - 9
59.8%z 3.80 - 10
55.8%z 3.75 - 11
54.2%z 3.73 - 12
53%z 3.72 - 13
50.4%z 3.69 - 14
48.4%z 3.67 - 15
48.1%z 3.67 - 16
48%z 3.67 - 17
47.5%z 3.64 - 18
46.6%z 3.58 - 19
46.2%z 3.55 - 20
46.2%z 3.55 - 21
45.8%z 3.52 - 22
45.8%z 3.52 - 23
45.5%z 3.50 - 24
45.3%z 3.49 - 25
45.2%z 3.48 - 26
44.3%z 3.43 - 27
44%z 3.41 - 28
43.7%z 3.39 - 29
43.4%z 3.37 - 30
43.4%z 3.37 - 31
43.2%z 3.36 - 32
43.2%z 3.36 - 33
43%z 3.34 - 34
42.9%z 3.33 - 35
42.8%z 3.33 - 36
42.8%z 3.33 - 37
42.4%z 3.30 - 38
42.4%z 3.30 - 39
42.3%z 3.30 - 40
42.2%z 3.29 - 41
41.9%z 3.27 - 42
41.7%z 3.26 - 43
41.3%z 3.23 - 44
40.9%z 3.21 - 45
40.9%z 3.21 - 46
40.7%z 3.19 - 47
40.6%z 3.19 - 48
40.6%z 3.19 - 49
40.6%z 3.18 - 50
40.5%z 3.18