David Bingham: raw computed results
The raw ranking from the production similarity calculation (face-embedding centroid cosine → gender-cohort z-normalization). The web-opinion crown, curation, and fusion re-rank are removed.
- 1
82.8%z 4.24 - 2
82.4%z 4.21 - 3
68.6%z 3.89 - 4
58.5%z 3.78 - 5
56%z 3.75 - 6
46.1%z 3.54 - 7
45%z 3.47 - 8
44.6%z 3.44 - 9
43.9%z 3.40 - 10
43.8%z 3.39 - 11
43.6%z 3.38 - 12
42.6%z 3.32 - 13
42.4%z 3.30 - 14
41.5%z 3.24 - 15
41.3%z 3.23 - 16
41.1%z 3.22 - 17
40.7%z 3.19 - 18
40.3%z 3.17 - 19
40.2%z 3.16 - 20
39.8%z 3.13 - 21
39.7%z 3.13 - 22
39.1%z 3.09 - 23
39%z 3.08 - 24
38.9%z 3.08 - 25
38.8%z 3.07 - 26
38.4%z 3.05 - 27
38.4%z 3.04 - 28
38.3%z 3.04 - 29
38.3%z 3.04 - 30
38.2%z 3.03 - 31
38.2%z 3.03 - 32
38.1%z 3.02 - 33
37.9%z 3.01 - 34
37.8%z 3.01 - 35
37.7%z 3.00 - 36
37.5%z 2.99 - 37
37.4%z 2.98 - 38
37.3%z 2.97 - 39
37.1%z 2.96 - 40
36.8%z 2.94 - 41
36.8%z 2.94 - 42
36.6%z 2.93 - 43
36.6%z 2.93 - 44
36.4%z 2.91 - 45
36.1%z 2.89 - 46
36.1%z 2.89 - 47
36%z 2.89 - 48
35.8%z 2.87 - 49
35.7%z 2.87 - 50
35.7%z 2.87