Emily Armstrong: raw computed results
The raw ranking from the production similarity calculation (face-embedding centroid cosine → gender-cohort z-normalization). The web-opinion crown, curation, and fusion re-rank are removed.
- 1
89.8%z 4.81 - 2
82.7%z 4.24 - 3
82.5%z 4.22 - 4
82.1%z 4.19 - 5
81.3%z 4.13 - 6
66.5%z 3.87 - 7
65.6%z 3.86 - 8
57.9%z 3.78 - 9
47.8%z 3.65 - 10
46.9%z 3.59 - 11
46.3%z 3.56 - 12
46%z 3.54 - 13
45.8%z 3.52 - 14
45.7%z 3.52 - 15
45.6%z 3.51 - 16
45.2%z 3.49 - 17
45.1%z 3.48 - 18
44.6%z 3.45 - 19
43.9%z 3.40 - 20
43.8%z 3.40 - 21
43.8%z 3.39 - 22
43.4%z 3.37 - 23
43.2%z 3.36 - 24
43.2%z 3.36 - 25
43.1%z 3.35 - 26
43.1%z 3.35 - 27
42.8%z 3.33 - 28
42.8%z 3.33 - 29
42.4%z 3.30 - 30
42.3%z 3.29 - 31
42.2%z 3.29 - 32
42.2%z 3.29 - 33
42.1%z 3.29 - 34
41.7%z 3.26 - 35
41.7%z 3.26 - 36
41.6%z 3.25 - 37
41.5%z 3.25 - 38
41.5%z 3.24 - 39
41.4%z 3.24 - 40
40.8%z 3.20 - 41
40.7%z 3.19 - 42
40.6%z 3.19 - 43
40.4%z 3.17 - 44
40%z 3.15 - 45
39.9%z 3.14 - 46
39.9%z 3.14 - 47
39.6%z 3.12 - 48
39.2%z 3.10 - 49
39.2%z 3.10 - 50
38.7%z 3.06