Kim Dickens: raw computed results
The raw ranking from the production similarity calculation (face-embedding centroid cosine → gender-cohort z-normalization). The web-opinion crown, curation, and fusion re-rank are removed.
- 1
86.6%z 4.55 - 2
84.6%z 4.39 - 3
82.5%z 4.22 - 4
77.5%z 3.99 - 5
71.7%z 3.93 - 6
71.7%z 3.93 - 7
70.6%z 3.91 - 8
67.1%z 3.88 - 9
58.2%z 3.78 - 10
57.7%z 3.77 - 11
56.5%z 3.76 - 12
54.8%z 3.74 - 13
50.7%z 3.70 - 14
50.6%z 3.70 - 15
48%z 3.66 - 16
47.6%z 3.64 - 17
47.6%z 3.64 - 18
46.8%z 3.59 - 19
46.5%z 3.57 - 20
46%z 3.54 - 21
45.7%z 3.52 - 22
44.3%z 3.42 - 23
43.5%z 3.38 - 24
43.3%z 3.36 - 25
43.2%z 3.36 - 26
43%z 3.34 - 27
42.7%z 3.32 - 28
42.5%z 3.31 - 29
42.3%z 3.30 - 30
42.2%z 3.29 - 31
41.9%z 3.27 - 32
41.9%z 3.27 - 33
41.8%z 3.26 - 34
41.6%z 3.25 - 35
41.5%z 3.24 - 36
41.5%z 3.24 - 37
41.4%z 3.24 - 38
41.2%z 3.23 - 39
40.5%z 3.18 - 40
40.4%z 3.18 - 41
40.4%z 3.17 - 42
40.3%z 3.17 - 43
40.3%z 3.17 - 44
40.2%z 3.16 - 45
40.1%z 3.16 - 46
40%z 3.15 - 47
39.9%z 3.14 - 48
39.2%z 3.10 - 49
39.2%z 3.10 - 50
39.2%z 3.09