Luke Chambers: raw computed results
The raw ranking from the production similarity calculation (face-embedding centroid cosine → gender-cohort z-normalization). The web-opinion crown, curation, and fusion re-rank are removed.
- 1
66.6%z 3.87 - 2
54.1%z 3.73 - 3
49.1%z 3.68 - 4
47%z 3.60 - 5
46.4%z 3.56 - 6
46%z 3.54 - 7
45%z 3.47 - 8
44.4%z 3.43 - 9
44.4%z 3.43 - 10
43.4%z 3.37 - 11
42.5%z 3.31 - 12
42.5%z 3.31 - 13
41.3%z 3.23 - 14
41%z 3.21 - 15
39.7%z 3.13 - 16
39.6%z 3.12 - 17
39.6%z 3.12 - 18
39.6%z 3.12 - 19
39.4%z 3.11 - 20
38.9%z 3.07 - 21
38.7%z 3.06 - 2238.7%z 3.06
- 23
38.5%z 3.05 - 24
38.5%z 3.05 - 25
38.3%z 3.04 - 26
38.2%z 3.03 - 27
37.8%z 3.01 - 28
37.7%z 3.00 - 29
37.7%z 3.00 - 30
37.6%z 2.99 - 31
37.2%z 2.97 - 32
37.2%z 2.96 - 33
36.3%z 2.91 - 34
36.2%z 2.90 - 35
36%z 2.89 - 36
36%z 2.89 - 37
35.8%z 2.88 - 38
35.1%z 2.83 - 39
35%z 2.83 - 40
34.8%z 2.81 - 41
34.6%z 2.80 - 42
34.5%z 2.79 - 43
34.5%z 2.79 - 44
34.5%z 2.79 - 45
34.5%z 2.79 - 46
34.5%z 2.79 - 47
34.2%z 2.77 - 48
34.1%z 2.77 - 49
34%z 2.76 - 50
34%z 2.76