Michael Iber: raw computed results
The raw ranking from the production similarity calculation (face-embedding centroid cosine → gender-cohort z-normalization). The web-opinion crown, curation, and fusion re-rank are removed.
- 1
82.7%z 4.23 - 2
81.2%z 4.11 - 3
67.6%z 3.88 - 4
47.7%z 3.65 - 5
46.4%z 3.56 - 6
46%z 3.54 - 7
45.7%z 3.52 - 8
45.7%z 3.51 - 9
45.3%z 3.49 - 10
45.3%z 3.49 - 11
45.2%z 3.48 - 12
44.3%z 3.43 - 13
43.8%z 3.40 - 14
43.2%z 3.36 - 15
42.6%z 3.32 - 16
42.5%z 3.31 - 17
42.5%z 3.31 - 18
42.3%z 3.30 - 19
42.1%z 3.29 - 20
41.9%z 3.27 - 21
41.2%z 3.22 - 22
40.8%z 3.20 - 23
40.6%z 3.19 - 24
40.6%z 3.19 - 25
40.4%z 3.17 - 26
40.2%z 3.16 - 27
40.1%z 3.15 - 28
40%z 3.15 - 29
39.9%z 3.14 - 30
39.9%z 3.14 - 31
39.7%z 3.13 - 32
39.4%z 3.11 - 33
39.1%z 3.09 - 34
39%z 3.08 - 35
38.8%z 3.07 - 36
38.7%z 3.06 - 37
38.2%z 3.03 - 38
38%z 3.02 - 39
38%z 3.02 - 40
37.9%z 3.01 - 41
37.8%z 3.01 - 42
37.7%z 3.00 - 43
37.4%z 2.98 - 44
37.3%z 2.97 - 45
36.8%z 2.94 - 46
36.8%z 2.94 - 47
36.7%z 2.93 - 48
36.5%z 2.92 - 49
36.4%z 2.91 - 50
36.3%z 2.91