Nathan Lawr: raw computed results
The raw ranking from the production similarity calculation (face-embedding centroid cosine → gender-cohort z-normalization). The web-opinion crown, curation, and fusion re-rank are removed.
- 1
94.1%z 5.61 - 2
83.4%z 4.29 - 3
62%z 3.82 - 4
56.3%z 3.76 - 5
52.5%z 3.72 - 6
50.1%z 3.69 - 7
47.4%z 3.63 - 8
47.4%z 3.63 - 9
46.9%z 3.60 - 10
46.8%z 3.59 - 11
46.1%z 3.54 - 12
45.5%z 3.51 - 13
45%z 3.47 - 14
44.5%z 3.44 - 15
44.5%z 3.44 - 16
44.2%z 3.42 - 17
44.1%z 3.42 - 18
44%z 3.41 - 19
43.9%z 3.40 - 20
43.4%z 3.37 - 21
42.9%z 3.33 - 22
42.5%z 3.31 - 23
42.3%z 3.30 - 24
42.2%z 3.29 - 25
42.1%z 3.29 - 26
40.4%z 3.17 - 27
40.3%z 3.17 - 28
40.3%z 3.17 - 29
40%z 3.15 - 30
39.9%z 3.14 - 31
39.9%z 3.14 - 32
39.7%z 3.13 - 33
39.5%z 3.12 - 34
39.4%z 3.11 - 35
39.3%z 3.11 - 36
39.2%z 3.10 - 37
39.2%z 3.09 - 38
39.2%z 3.09 - 39
39.1%z 3.09 - 40
39.1%z 3.09 - 41
39.1%z 3.09 - 42
38.9%z 3.08 - 43
38.7%z 3.06 - 44
38.6%z 3.06 - 45
38.5%z 3.05 - 46
38.2%z 3.03 - 47
38.1%z 3.03 - 48
37.9%z 3.01 - 49
37.8%z 3.01 - 50
37.7%z 3.00