Slim Thug: raw computed results
The raw ranking from the production similarity calculation (face-embedding centroid cosine → gender-cohort z-normalization). The web-opinion crown, curation, and fusion re-rank are removed.
- 1
61.5%z 3.81 - 2
61.4%z 3.81 - 3
56.4%z 3.76 - 4
48%z 3.66 - 5
47.2%z 3.61 - 6
47.2%z 3.61 - 7
46.8%z 3.59 - 8
45.5%z 3.51 - 9
44.9%z 3.47 - 10
44.2%z 3.42 - 11
43.8%z 3.40 - 12
43.8%z 3.40 - 13
43.7%z 3.39 - 14
43.5%z 3.37 - 15
43.3%z 3.36 - 16
43.2%z 3.36 - 17
42.6%z 3.32 - 18
42.1%z 3.29 - 19
41.5%z 3.25 - 20
41.4%z 3.24 - 21
41.2%z 3.22 - 22
40.7%z 3.19 - 23
40.6%z 3.18 - 24
40.5%z 3.18 - 25
39.9%z 3.14 - 26
39.5%z 3.12 - 27
38.6%z 3.06 - 28
38.6%z 3.06 - 29
38.4%z 3.05 - 30
38.4%z 3.04 - 31
38%z 3.02 - 32
38%z 3.02 - 33
37.9%z 3.01 - 34
37.9%z 3.01 - 35
37.7%z 3.00 - 36
37.2%z 2.97 - 37
37.1%z 2.96 - 38
37%z 2.95 - 39
36.9%z 2.94 - 40
36.7%z 2.93 - 41
36.6%z 2.93 - 42
36.3%z 2.91 - 43
36.2%z 2.90 - 44
36.2%z 2.90 - 45
36.2%z 2.90 - 46
36.1%z 2.89 - 47
36%z 2.89 - 48
36%z 2.89 - 49
36%z 2.89 - 50
35.8%z 2.88