Thomas Kagermann: raw computed results
The raw ranking from the production similarity calculation (face-embedding centroid cosine → gender-cohort z-normalization). The web-opinion crown, curation, and fusion re-rank are removed.
- 1
80.7%z 4.07 - 2
66.1%z 3.87 - 3
60%z 3.80 - 4
58.5%z 3.78 - 5
49.3%z 3.68 - 6
49.3%z 3.68 - 7
48.5%z 3.67 - 8
47.4%z 3.63 - 9
46.1%z 3.55 - 10
45.6%z 3.51 - 11
45.5%z 3.50 - 12
45.2%z 3.49 - 13
45.1%z 3.48 - 14
44.4%z 3.43 - 15
43.2%z 3.36 - 16
43.2%z 3.36 - 17
42.8%z 3.33 - 18
42.2%z 3.29 - 19
41.5%z 3.25 - 20
41.2%z 3.23 - 21
41.1%z 3.22 - 22
41.1%z 3.22 - 23
40.8%z 3.20 - 24
40.5%z 3.18 - 25
40.3%z 3.17 - 26
40.2%z 3.16 - 27
39.9%z 3.14 - 28
39.1%z 3.09 - 29
39%z 3.08 - 30
38.9%z 3.07 - 31
38.9%z 3.07 - 32
38.6%z 3.06 - 33
38%z 3.02 - 34
37.9%z 3.01 - 35
37.9%z 3.01 - 36
37.7%z 3.00 - 37
37.6%z 2.99 - 38
37.4%z 2.98 - 39
37.3%z 2.97 - 40
37.3%z 2.97 - 41
37.2%z 2.97 - 42
37.2%z 2.97 - 43
37.1%z 2.96 - 44
37.1%z 2.96 - 45
36.9%z 2.95 - 46
36.9%z 2.95 - 47
36.8%z 2.94 - 48
36.4%z 2.92 - 49
36.4%z 2.92 - 50
36.4%z 2.91