Thomas Prazak: raw computed results
The raw ranking from the production similarity calculation (face-embedding centroid cosine → gender-cohort z-normalization). The web-opinion crown, curation, and fusion re-rank are removed.
- 1
80.6%z 4.07 - 2
77.4%z 3.99 - 3
72.1%z 3.93 - 4
62.3%z 3.82 - 5
61.9%z 3.82 - 654.4%z 3.74
- 7
49.8%z 3.69 - 8
46.9%z 3.60 - 9
46.9%z 3.60 - 10
46.2%z 3.55 - 11
45.7%z 3.52 - 12
45.3%z 3.49 - 13
44.5%z 3.44 - 14
43.7%z 3.39 - 15
43.4%z 3.37 - 16
43.2%z 3.36 - 17
43.1%z 3.35 - 18
42.9%z 3.34 - 19
42.8%z 3.33 - 20
42.8%z 3.33 - 21
42.6%z 3.32 - 22
42.4%z 3.30 - 23
42.2%z 3.29 - 24
42.2%z 3.29 - 25
42%z 3.28 - 26
41.6%z 3.25 - 27
41.5%z 3.24 - 28
40.8%z 3.20 - 29
40.6%z 3.19 - 30
40%z 3.15 - 3140%z 3.15
- 32
39.9%z 3.14 - 33
39.8%z 3.14 - 34
39.7%z 3.13 - 35
39.5%z 3.12 - 36
39.4%z 3.11 - 37
39.4%z 3.11 - 38
39%z 3.08 - 39
38.5%z 3.05 - 40
38.1%z 3.02 - 41
38%z 3.02 - 42
38%z 3.02 - 43
37.9%z 3.01 - 44
37.7%z 3.00 - 45
37.6%z 2.99 - 46
37.6%z 2.99 - 47
37.6%z 2.99 - 48
37.5%z 2.98 - 49
37.4%z 2.98 - 50
37.2%z 2.97