William Kinderman: raw computed results
The raw ranking from the production similarity calculation (face-embedding centroid cosine → gender-cohort z-normalization). The web-opinion crown, curation, and fusion re-rank are removed.
- 1
60.2%z 3.80 - 2
54.6%z 3.74 - 3
47.8%z 3.66 - 4
47.5%z 3.63 - 5
47.2%z 3.61 - 6
46.8%z 3.59 - 7
46.6%z 3.57 - 8
46.1%z 3.54 - 9
46%z 3.54 - 10
44.9%z 3.46 - 11
44.2%z 3.42 - 12
41.4%z 3.24 - 13
41.2%z 3.22 - 14
41%z 3.22 - 15
41%z 3.21 - 16
41%z 3.21 - 17
40.5%z 3.18 - 18
40.1%z 3.16 - 19
39.8%z 3.13 - 20
39.3%z 3.11 - 21
39.3%z 3.10 - 22
39.2%z 3.09 - 23
39%z 3.08 - 24
39%z 3.08 - 25
38.9%z 3.08 - 26
38.9%z 3.08 - 27
38.8%z 3.07 - 28
38.6%z 3.06 - 29
38.6%z 3.06 - 30
38.5%z 3.05 - 31
38.3%z 3.04 - 32
38.1%z 3.03 - 33
38%z 3.02 - 34
37.8%z 3.01 - 35
37.8%z 3.00 - 36
37.7%z 3.00 - 37
37.4%z 2.98 - 38
37.2%z 2.96 - 39
36.6%z 2.93 - 40
36.6%z 2.93 - 41
36.3%z 2.91 - 42
36%z 2.89 - 43
35.9%z 2.88 - 44
35.6%z 2.86 - 45
35.6%z 2.86 - 46
35.6%z 2.86 - 47
35.5%z 2.85 - 48
35.3%z 2.84 - 49
35.2%z 2.84 - 50
35.2%z 2.83