Dylan Timber: raw computed results
The raw ranking from the production similarity calculation (face-embedding centroid cosine → gender-cohort z-normalization). The web-opinion crown, curation, and fusion re-rank are removed.
- 1
90.7%z 4.96 - 2
84.5%z 4.38 - 3
80%z 4.02 - 4
60.8%z 3.81 - 5
56.8%z 3.76 - 6
51.9%z 3.71 - 7
49.3%z 3.68 - 8
47.4%z 3.62 - 9
47.1%z 3.61 - 10
46.2%z 3.55 - 11
45.7%z 3.52 - 12
45.5%z 3.50 - 13
45.4%z 3.50 - 14
43.7%z 3.39 - 15
43.7%z 3.39 - 16
42.9%z 3.34 - 17
42.8%z 3.33 - 18
41.6%z 3.25 - 19
41.2%z 3.22 - 20
41.1%z 3.22 - 21
41%z 3.21 - 22
41%z 3.21 - 23
40.7%z 3.19 - 24
40.1%z 3.15 - 25
39.7%z 3.13 - 26
39.2%z 3.10 - 27
39.1%z 3.09 - 28
38.5%z 3.05 - 29
38.4%z 3.05 - 30
38.1%z 3.03 - 31
38.1%z 3.02 - 32
37.7%z 3.00 - 33
37.5%z 2.98 - 34
37.4%z 2.98 - 35
36.9%z 2.95 - 36
36.5%z 2.92 - 37
36.5%z 2.92 - 38
36.5%z 2.92 - 39
36%z 2.89 - 40
36%z 2.89 - 41
35.9%z 2.88 - 42
35.8%z 2.87 - 43
35.8%z 2.87 - 44
35.7%z 2.87 - 45
35.7%z 2.87 - 46
35.6%z 2.87 - 47
35.6%z 2.86 - 48
35.6%z 2.86 - 49
35.6%z 2.86 - 50
35.5%z 2.86