Jason Everman: raw computed results
The raw ranking from the production similarity calculation (face-embedding centroid cosine → gender-cohort z-normalization). The web-opinion crown, curation, and fusion re-rank are removed.
- 1
87.3%z 4.62 - 2
79.1%z 4.01 - 3
71.1%z 3.92 - 4
63.6%z 3.84 - 5
63.2%z 3.83 - 6
54.5%z 3.74 - 7
50.7%z 3.70 - 8
49.7%z 3.69 - 9
48.3%z 3.67 - 10
47.3%z 3.62 - 11
47.1%z 3.61 - 12
46.5%z 3.57 - 13
46%z 3.54 - 14
45.5%z 3.51 - 15
44%z 3.41 - 16
43.4%z 3.37 - 17
43.3%z 3.37 - 18
43.1%z 3.35 - 19
42.9%z 3.34 - 20
42.6%z 3.31 - 21
41.7%z 3.26 - 22
41.5%z 3.24 - 23
41.4%z 3.24 - 24
40.7%z 3.19 - 25
40.4%z 3.18 - 26
39.9%z 3.14 - 27
39.6%z 3.12 - 28
39.5%z 3.12 - 29
39.4%z 3.11 - 30
38.8%z 3.07 - 31
38.8%z 3.07 - 32
38.7%z 3.07 - 33
38.6%z 3.06 - 34
38.4%z 3.04 - 35
37.7%z 3.00 - 36
37.3%z 2.98 - 37
37.2%z 2.96 - 38
37.1%z 2.96 - 39
36.9%z 2.95 - 40
36.9%z 2.95 - 41
36.8%z 2.94 - 42
36.8%z 2.94 - 43
36.8%z 2.94 - 44
36.6%z 2.93 - 45
36.5%z 2.92 - 46
36.2%z 2.90 - 47
36.1%z 2.89 - 48
35.9%z 2.88 - 49
35.6%z 2.87 - 50
35.3%z 2.84