Mathew Thomas: raw computed results
The raw ranking from the production similarity calculation (face-embedding centroid cosine → gender-cohort z-normalization). The web-opinion crown, curation, and fusion re-rank are removed.
- 1
76%z 3.97 - 2
71.7%z 3.93 - 3
69.5%z 3.90 - 4
53.5%z 3.73 - 5
52.4%z 3.71 - 6
50%z 3.69 - 7
49.5%z 3.68 - 8
48.2%z 3.67 - 9
47.5%z 3.63 - 10
47.3%z 3.62 - 11
46.8%z 3.59 - 12
46.3%z 3.55 - 13
46%z 3.54 - 14
45.9%z 3.53 - 15
45.7%z 3.52 - 16
44.5%z 3.44 - 17
44.1%z 3.41 - 18
43.9%z 3.40 - 19
43.2%z 3.35 - 20
42.9%z 3.33 - 21
42.4%z 3.30 - 22
41.7%z 3.26 - 23
41.6%z 3.25 - 24
41.4%z 3.24 - 25
41.3%z 3.23 - 26
40.6%z 3.19 - 27
40.6%z 3.19 - 28
40.5%z 3.18 - 29
40.5%z 3.18 - 30
40.2%z 3.16 - 31
40.1%z 3.15 - 32
39.8%z 3.14 - 33
39.6%z 3.12 - 34
39.4%z 3.11 - 35
38.9%z 3.08 - 36
38.8%z 3.07 - 37
38.8%z 3.07 - 38
38.6%z 3.06 - 39
38.6%z 3.06 - 40
38.5%z 3.05 - 41
38.4%z 3.05 - 42
38.3%z 3.04 - 43
38.1%z 3.03 - 44
37.9%z 3.01 - 45
37.9%z 3.01 - 46
37.8%z 3.01 - 47
37.8%z 3.00 - 48
37.6%z 2.99 - 49
37.5%z 2.99 - 50
37.5%z 2.99