Tim Dieck: raw computed results
The raw ranking from the production similarity calculation (face-embedding centroid cosine → gender-cohort z-normalization). The web-opinion crown, curation, and fusion re-rank are removed.
- 1
81.2%z 4.11 - 2
57.4%z 3.77 - 3
51.4%z 3.70 - 4
48.8%z 3.68 - 5
47.1%z 3.61 - 6
47%z 3.60 - 7
46.3%z 3.55 - 8
45.5%z 3.51 - 9
45.4%z 3.50 - 10
45.2%z 3.49 - 11
45.2%z 3.48 - 12
44.4%z 3.43 - 13
44.3%z 3.43 - 14
44.1%z 3.41 - 15
44.1%z 3.41 - 16
44%z 3.40 - 17
43.4%z 3.37 - 18
43.2%z 3.35 - 19
42.8%z 3.33 - 20
42.4%z 3.30 - 21
42.3%z 3.30 - 22
42.2%z 3.29 - 23
41.8%z 3.27 - 24
41.5%z 3.24 - 25
41%z 3.21 - 26
41%z 3.21 - 27
40.3%z 3.17 - 28
40.1%z 3.16 - 29
39.9%z 3.14 - 30
39.8%z 3.13 - 31
39%z 3.09 - 32
38.8%z 3.07 - 33
38.8%z 3.07 - 34
38.8%z 3.07 - 35
38.6%z 3.06 - 36
38.4%z 3.05 - 37
38.3%z 3.04 - 38
38%z 3.02 - 39
37.9%z 3.01 - 40
37.7%z 3.00 - 41
37.4%z 2.98 - 42
37.2%z 2.97 - 43
37.2%z 2.97 - 44
37.1%z 2.96 - 45
37%z 2.96 - 46
37%z 2.95 - 47
36.6%z 2.93 - 48
36.6%z 2.93 - 49
36.6%z 2.92 - 50
36.5%z 2.92