Tom James: raw computed results
The raw ranking from the production similarity calculation (face-embedding centroid cosine → gender-cohort z-normalization). The web-opinion crown, curation, and fusion re-rank are removed.
- 1
87.7%z 4.65 - 2
82.9%z 4.26 - 3
81.8%z 4.16 - 4
74.7%z 3.96 - 5
60.1%z 3.80 - 6
56.3%z 3.76 - 7
54.6%z 3.74 - 8
47.5%z 3.63 - 9
47.4%z 3.63 - 10
47.1%z 3.61 - 11
46.8%z 3.59 - 12
46.1%z 3.55 - 13
45.6%z 3.51 - 14
44.9%z 3.46 - 15
44.6%z 3.44 - 16
44.4%z 3.43 - 17
44.3%z 3.42 - 18
44.2%z 3.42 - 19
44.1%z 3.41 - 20
43.8%z 3.40 - 21
43.1%z 3.35 - 22
43.1%z 3.35 - 23
43%z 3.34 - 24
41.1%z 3.22 - 25
41%z 3.22 - 26
41%z 3.22 - 27
40.9%z 3.21 - 28
40.8%z 3.20 - 29
40.8%z 3.20 - 30
40.3%z 3.17 - 31
39.7%z 3.13 - 32
39.3%z 3.10 - 33
39.1%z 3.09 - 34
38.7%z 3.07 - 35
38.7%z 3.06 - 36
38.6%z 3.06 - 37
38.4%z 3.04 - 38
38.2%z 3.03 - 39
38.2%z 3.03 - 40
38.2%z 3.03 - 41
38.1%z 3.02 - 42
37.9%z 3.01 - 43
37.9%z 3.01 - 44
37.8%z 3.01 - 45
37.7%z 3.00 - 46
37.7%z 3.00 - 47
37.6%z 2.99 - 48
37.5%z 2.99 - 49
37.5%z 2.98 - 50
37.4%z 2.98