Tim Armacost: raw computed results
The raw ranking from the production similarity calculation (face-embedding centroid cosine → gender-cohort z-normalization). The web-opinion crown, curation, and fusion re-rank are removed.
- 1
87.6%z 4.63 - 2
71.7%z 3.93 - 3
71.6%z 3.92 - 4
71.2%z 3.92 - 5
68.9%z 3.90 - 6
64.7%z 3.85 - 7
60.4%z 3.80 - 8
53.1%z 3.72 - 9
47.1%z 3.61 - 10
46.9%z 3.60 - 11
45.8%z 3.52 - 12
45.4%z 3.50 - 13
44.2%z 3.42 - 14
43.1%z 3.35 - 15
42.2%z 3.29 - 16
41.6%z 3.25 - 17
41.2%z 3.23 - 18
40.8%z 3.20 - 19
40.7%z 3.19 - 20
40.6%z 3.19 - 21
40.2%z 3.16 - 22
39.8%z 3.14 - 23
39.5%z 3.12 - 24
39.1%z 3.09 - 25
39%z 3.08 - 26
38.9%z 3.08 - 27
38.9%z 3.07 - 28
38.9%z 3.07 - 29
38.8%z 3.07 - 30
38.7%z 3.06 - 31
38.5%z 3.05 - 32
38.5%z 3.05 - 33
38.5%z 3.05 - 34
38.4%z 3.05 - 35
38.3%z 3.04 - 36
38.3%z 3.04 - 37
38.2%z 3.03 - 38
38%z 3.02 - 39
37.9%z 3.01 - 40
37.8%z 3.01 - 41
37.8%z 3.00 - 42
37.6%z 3.00 - 43
37.6%z 2.99 - 44
37.6%z 2.99 - 45
37.5%z 2.98 - 46
37.3%z 2.98 - 47
37.1%z 2.96 - 48
36.8%z 2.94 - 49
36.8%z 2.94 - 50
36.7%z 2.93