Christian Dahm: raw computed results
The raw ranking from the production similarity calculation (face-embedding centroid cosine → gender-cohort z-normalization). The web-opinion crown, curation, and fusion re-rank are removed.
- 1
72.1%z 3.93 - 2
46.2%z 3.55 - 3
45.6%z 3.51 - 4
45%z 3.47 - 5
45%z 3.47 - 6
43.5%z 3.37 - 7
42.9%z 3.33 - 8
42.5%z 3.31 - 9
41.6%z 3.25 - 10
41%z 3.21 - 11
40.7%z 3.19 - 12
39.9%z 3.14 - 13
39.8%z 3.14 - 14
39.8%z 3.13 - 15
39.2%z 3.10 - 16
38.6%z 3.06 - 17
38%z 3.02 - 18
37.9%z 3.01 - 19
37.9%z 3.01 - 20
37.8%z 3.00 - 21
37.7%z 3.00 - 22
37.6%z 3.00 - 23
37.5%z 2.98 - 24
36.9%z 2.95 - 25
36.7%z 2.93 - 26
36.7%z 2.93 - 27
36.5%z 2.92 - 28
36.2%z 2.90 - 29
36%z 2.89 - 30
35.9%z 2.88 - 31
35.7%z 2.87 - 32
35.6%z 2.86 - 33
35.5%z 2.85 - 34
35.3%z 2.84 - 35
35.3%z 2.84 - 36
35.1%z 2.83 - 37
35.1%z 2.83 - 38
34.5%z 2.79 - 39
34.1%z 2.77 - 40
34.1%z 2.77 - 41
34%z 2.76 - 42
34%z 2.76 - 43
33.8%z 2.75 - 44
33.8%z 2.75 - 45
33.8%z 2.75 - 46
33.7%z 2.74 - 47
33.6%z 2.74 - 48
33.4%z 2.72 - 49
33.2%z 2.71 - 50
33.1%z 2.70