Christopher Kindred: raw computed results
The raw ranking from the production similarity calculation (face-embedding centroid cosine → gender-cohort z-normalization). The web-opinion crown, curation, and fusion re-rank are removed.
- 1
82.9%z 4.25 - 2
80.6%z 4.06 - 3
66.5%z 3.87 - 4
59.6%z 3.79 - 5
58.3%z 3.78 - 6
47.8%z 3.65 - 7
46.2%z 3.55 - 8
45.6%z 3.51 - 9
45.2%z 3.49 - 10
43.9%z 3.40 - 11
43.4%z 3.37 - 12
43%z 3.34 - 13
42.6%z 3.32 - 14
41.4%z 3.24 - 15
41.4%z 3.24 - 16
41.1%z 3.22 - 17
41%z 3.21 - 18
40.9%z 3.21 - 19
40.8%z 3.20 - 20
40.7%z 3.19 - 21
40.6%z 3.18 - 22
40.4%z 3.17 - 23
40.2%z 3.16 - 24
40.1%z 3.15 - 25
39.7%z 3.13 - 26
39.6%z 3.12 - 27
39%z 3.08 - 28
38.8%z 3.07 - 29
38.5%z 3.05 - 30
38.2%z 3.03 - 31
38.2%z 3.03 - 32
37.9%z 3.01 - 33
37.8%z 3.00 - 34
37.4%z 2.98 - 35
37%z 2.96 - 36
37%z 2.95 - 37
37%z 2.95 - 38
36.9%z 2.95 - 39
36.9%z 2.95 - 40
36.8%z 2.94 - 41
36.7%z 2.93 - 42
36.5%z 2.92 - 43
36.3%z 2.91 - 44
36.3%z 2.91 - 45
36%z 2.89 - 46
35.6%z 2.86 - 47
35.5%z 2.86 - 48
35.4%z 2.85 - 49
35.2%z 2.84 - 50
35.1%z 2.83