David Immerglück: raw computed results
The raw ranking from the production similarity calculation (face-embedding centroid cosine → gender-cohort z-normalization). The web-opinion crown, curation, and fusion re-rank are removed.
- 1
84.3%z 4.36 - 2
81.2%z 4.12 - 3
77%z 3.98 - 4
56.7%z 3.76 - 5
47%z 3.60 - 6
46.6%z 3.58 - 7
45.9%z 3.53 - 8
45.1%z 3.48 - 9
44.9%z 3.47 - 10
44.7%z 3.45 - 11
44.3%z 3.42 - 12
43.9%z 3.40 - 13
43.8%z 3.39 - 14
43.7%z 3.39 - 15
42%z 3.28 - 16
41.4%z 3.24 - 17
41.4%z 3.24 - 18
41.2%z 3.23 - 19
41.1%z 3.22 - 20
41.1%z 3.22 - 21
40.9%z 3.21 - 22
40.9%z 3.21 - 23
40.4%z 3.17 - 24
40.1%z 3.16 - 25
39.9%z 3.14 - 26
39.8%z 3.13 - 27
39.4%z 3.11 - 28
39%z 3.08 - 29
38.4%z 3.05 - 30
38.3%z 3.04 - 31
38.3%z 3.04 - 32
38.3%z 3.03 - 33
38.2%z 3.03 - 34
38.2%z 3.03 - 35
38.1%z 3.03 - 36
38.1%z 3.03 - 37
37.9%z 3.01 - 38
37.9%z 3.01 - 39
37.9%z 3.01 - 40
37.7%z 3.00 - 41
37.7%z 3.00 - 42
37.5%z 2.98 - 43
37.4%z 2.98 - 44
37.4%z 2.98 - 45
37.4%z 2.98 - 46
37%z 2.95 - 47
36.9%z 2.95 - 48
36.8%z 2.94 - 49
36.6%z 2.93 - 50
36.6%z 2.93