Graham Mink: raw computed results
The raw ranking from the production similarity calculation (face-embedding centroid cosine → gender-cohort z-normalization). The web-opinion crown, curation, and fusion re-rank are removed.
- 1
83.8%z 4.33 - 2
77.2%z 3.99 - 3
72.8%z 3.94 - 4
71.5%z 3.92 - 5
62%z 3.82 - 6
56.8%z 3.76 - 7
48%z 3.67 - 8
46.7%z 3.58 - 9
46.3%z 3.56 - 10
45.4%z 3.50 - 11
45.4%z 3.50 - 12
45.3%z 3.49 - 13
43.9%z 3.40 - 14
43.2%z 3.36 - 15
43.1%z 3.35 - 16
43%z 3.34 - 17
42.7%z 3.32 - 18
42.5%z 3.31 - 19
42%z 3.28 - 20
41.7%z 3.26 - 21
41.4%z 3.24 - 22
41.3%z 3.23 - 23
41.2%z 3.22 - 24
41%z 3.21 - 25
40.6%z 3.19 - 26
40.5%z 3.18 - 27
40.3%z 3.17 - 28
40.1%z 3.16 - 29
39.7%z 3.13 - 30
39.6%z 3.12 - 31
39.5%z 3.12 - 32
39.5%z 3.11 - 33
39.1%z 3.09 - 34
39%z 3.09 - 35
38.9%z 3.08 - 36
38.8%z 3.07 - 37
38.7%z 3.06 - 38
38.6%z 3.06 - 39
38.4%z 3.05 - 40
38.4%z 3.04 - 41
38.3%z 3.04 - 42
37.7%z 3.00 - 43
37.7%z 3.00 - 44
37.6%z 3.00 - 45
37.6%z 2.99 - 46
37.4%z 2.98 - 47
37.2%z 2.96 - 48
37.2%z 2.96 - 49
37.1%z 2.96 - 50
37%z 2.95