Julian Siegel: raw computed results
The raw ranking from the production similarity calculation (face-embedding centroid cosine → gender-cohort z-normalization). The web-opinion crown, curation, and fusion re-rank are removed.
- 1
91.1%z 5.04 - 2
85%z 4.42 - 3
67.2%z 3.88 - 4
66.8%z 3.87 - 5
65.2%z 3.85 - 6
60.2%z 3.80 - 7
52.1%z 3.71 - 8
46.2%z 3.55 - 9
45.3%z 3.49 - 10
43.4%z 3.37 - 11
42.9%z 3.33 - 12
42.6%z 3.32 - 13
42.4%z 3.31 - 14
42.2%z 3.29 - 15
42.1%z 3.29 - 16
42%z 3.28 - 17
41.6%z 3.25 - 18
40.6%z 3.19 - 19
40.5%z 3.18 - 20
39.6%z 3.12 - 21
39.4%z 3.11 - 22
39.4%z 3.11 - 23
39.2%z 3.10 - 24
39.2%z 3.10 - 25
38.8%z 3.07 - 26
38.7%z 3.07 - 27
38.7%z 3.06 - 28
38.6%z 3.06 - 29
38.5%z 3.05 - 30
38.5%z 3.05 - 31
38.5%z 3.05 - 32
38.3%z 3.04 - 33
38.3%z 3.04 - 34
38%z 3.02 - 35
37.9%z 3.01 - 36
37.8%z 3.00 - 37
37.6%z 2.99 - 38
37.5%z 2.99 - 39
37.1%z 2.96 - 40
37.1%z 2.96 - 41
37%z 2.95 - 42
36.9%z 2.95 - 43
36.7%z 2.94 - 44
36.7%z 2.93 - 45
36.5%z 2.92 - 46
36.4%z 2.91 - 47
36.2%z 2.90 - 48
36.1%z 2.89 - 49
36%z 2.89 - 50
35.9%z 2.88