Michael ten Hompel: raw computed results
The raw ranking from the production similarity calculation (face-embedding centroid cosine → gender-cohort z-normalization). The web-opinion crown, curation, and fusion re-rank are removed.
- 1
61.8%z 3.82 - 2
46.1%z 3.54 - 3
44.7%z 3.45 - 4
43.2%z 3.35 - 5
42.5%z 3.31 - 6
41.7%z 3.26 - 7
41.7%z 3.26 - 8
41%z 3.21 - 9
41%z 3.21 - 10
40.1%z 3.15 - 11
39.8%z 3.14 - 12
39.8%z 3.13 - 13
39.2%z 3.10 - 14
39.1%z 3.09 - 15
38.5%z 3.05 - 16
38.3%z 3.04 - 17
38.2%z 3.03 - 18
38.2%z 3.03 - 19
38.2%z 3.03 - 20
38.1%z 3.03 - 21
38.1%z 3.02 - 22
38%z 3.02 - 23
37.8%z 3.00 - 24
37.6%z 2.99 - 25
37.5%z 2.98 - 26
37.4%z 2.98 - 27
37.4%z 2.98 - 28
37.4%z 2.98 - 29
37.4%z 2.98 - 30
37.3%z 2.97 - 31
36.9%z 2.94 - 32
36.7%z 2.94 - 33
36.6%z 2.93 - 34
36.6%z 2.93 - 35
36.6%z 2.93 - 36
36.4%z 2.92 - 37
36.3%z 2.91 - 38
36.3%z 2.91 - 39
36.3%z 2.91 - 40
36.3%z 2.91 - 41
36.2%z 2.90 - 42
36%z 2.89 - 43
35.8%z 2.88 - 44
35.8%z 2.88 - 45
35.8%z 2.88 - 46
35.6%z 2.87 - 47
35.2%z 2.84 - 48
35%z 2.83 - 49
35%z 2.82 - 50
34.7%z 2.80