Paul Lamb: raw computed results
The raw ranking from the production similarity calculation (face-embedding centroid cosine → gender-cohort z-normalization). The web-opinion crown, curation, and fusion re-rank are removed.
- 1
82.7%z 4.23 - 2
81.2%z 4.12 - 3
80.9%z 4.09 - 4
80.7%z 4.08 - 5
80.2%z 4.04 - 6
78.3%z 4.00 - 7
70.2%z 3.91 - 8
67.5%z 3.88 - 9
63.2%z 3.83 - 10
59.4%z 3.79 - 11
57.3%z 3.77 - 12
48.8%z 3.68 - 13
47.9%z 3.66 - 14
46.8%z 3.59 - 15
45.8%z 3.53 - 16
45.4%z 3.50 - 17
44.9%z 3.46 - 18
44.4%z 3.44 - 19
43.6%z 3.38 - 20
43.5%z 3.38 - 21
43.4%z 3.37 - 22
43.3%z 3.36 - 23
43.2%z 3.35 - 24
42.8%z 3.33 - 25
42.6%z 3.32 - 26
42.5%z 3.31 - 27
42.2%z 3.29 - 28
42.2%z 3.29 - 29
42%z 3.28 - 30
41.9%z 3.27 - 31
41.3%z 3.23 - 32
41.1%z 3.22 - 33
41%z 3.22 - 34
40.4%z 3.17 - 35
40.3%z 3.17 - 36
39.9%z 3.14 - 37
39.5%z 3.12 - 38
39.3%z 3.10 - 39
39.1%z 3.09 - 40
39.1%z 3.09 - 41
38.9%z 3.07 - 42
38.8%z 3.07 - 43
38.4%z 3.05 - 44
38.3%z 3.04 - 45
38.2%z 3.03 - 46
38%z 3.02 - 47
38%z 3.02 - 48
38%z 3.02 - 49
37.9%z 3.01 - 50
37.7%z 3.00