Thomas Habermann: raw computed results
The raw ranking from the production similarity calculation (face-embedding centroid cosine → gender-cohort z-normalization). The web-opinion crown, curation, and fusion re-rank are removed.
- 1
87.6%z 4.64 - 2
60.8%z 3.81 - 3
46.9%z 3.60 - 4
45.1%z 3.48 - 5
44.5%z 3.44 - 6
42.5%z 3.31 - 7
42.3%z 3.30 - 8
42.1%z 3.29 - 9
41.3%z 3.24 - 10
41.3%z 3.23 - 11
39.3%z 3.10 - 12
38.7%z 3.07 - 13
37.9%z 3.01 - 14
37.8%z 3.00 - 15
36.7%z 2.94 - 16
36.6%z 2.93 - 17
36.1%z 2.90 - 18
35.6%z 2.86 - 19
35.3%z 2.85 - 20
35.3%z 2.84 - 21
35%z 2.82 - 22
34.6%z 2.80 - 23
34.5%z 2.79 - 24
34.1%z 2.77 - 25
34.1%z 2.77 - 26
34.1%z 2.77 - 27
33.9%z 2.76 - 28
33.9%z 2.75 - 29
33.8%z 2.75 - 30
33.7%z 2.74 - 31
33.5%z 2.72 - 32
33.4%z 2.72 - 33
33.1%z 2.70 - 34
32.9%z 2.69 - 35
32.8%z 2.68 - 36
32.8%z 2.68 - 37
32.2%z 2.64 - 38
32.1%z 2.64 - 39
32%z 2.63 - 40
31.7%z 2.61 - 41
31.7%z 2.61 - 42
31.7%z 2.61 - 43
31.6%z 2.60 - 44
31.5%z 2.59 - 45
31.4%z 2.59 - 46
31.4%z 2.59 - 47
31.3%z 2.59 - 48
31%z 2.56 - 49
31%z 2.56 - 50
30.9%z 2.56