Thomas Jurk: raw computed results
The raw ranking from the production similarity calculation (face-embedding centroid cosine → gender-cohort z-normalization). The web-opinion crown, curation, and fusion re-rank are removed.
- 1
86.9%z 4.58 - 2
83.2%z 4.28 - 3
82.2%z 4.20 - 4
81.8%z 4.16 - 5
80.5%z 4.06 - 6
80.3%z 4.04 - 7
69.9%z 3.91 - 8
51.5%z 3.71 - 9
49.6%z 3.68 - 10
46.9%z 3.59 - 11
45.8%z 3.52 - 12
45.5%z 3.51 - 13
45.2%z 3.49 - 14
45.1%z 3.48 - 15
45%z 3.47 - 16
45%z 3.47 - 17
44.3%z 3.43 - 18
44%z 3.40 - 19
43.4%z 3.37 - 20
42.7%z 3.32 - 21
42.6%z 3.32 - 22
42.2%z 3.29 - 23
42.1%z 3.29 - 24
42.1%z 3.28 - 25
42%z 3.28 - 26
41.9%z 3.27 - 27
41.8%z 3.26 - 28
41.7%z 3.26 - 29
41.6%z 3.25 - 30
41.3%z 3.23 - 31
41.3%z 3.23 - 32
41.1%z 3.22 - 33
41%z 3.21 - 34
41%z 3.21 - 35
41%z 3.21 - 36
40.9%z 3.21 - 37
40.8%z 3.20 - 38
40.8%z 3.20 - 39
40.6%z 3.19 - 40
40.3%z 3.17 - 41
40.3%z 3.17 - 42
40.1%z 3.16 - 43
40.1%z 3.16 - 44
40.1%z 3.15 - 45
40%z 3.15 - 46
39.9%z 3.14 - 47
39.8%z 3.14 - 48
39.8%z 3.14 - 49
39.5%z 3.11 - 50
39.4%z 3.11