Timothy John Creamer: raw computed results
The raw ranking from the production similarity calculation (face-embedding centroid cosine → gender-cohort z-normalization). The web-opinion crown, curation, and fusion re-rank are removed.
- 1
84.6%z 4.40 - 2
63.2%z 3.83 - 3
56.2%z 3.76 - 4
54.6%z 3.74 - 5
48.9%z 3.68 - 6
47.4%z 3.63 - 7
46.7%z 3.58 - 8
46%z 3.54 - 9
45.3%z 3.49 - 10
44.1%z 3.41 - 11
43.9%z 3.40 - 12
42.2%z 3.29 - 13
42.2%z 3.29 - 14
41.7%z 3.26 - 15
41.7%z 3.26 - 16
41.1%z 3.22 - 17
40.8%z 3.20 - 18
40.7%z 3.19 - 19
40.7%z 3.19 - 20
40.4%z 3.18 - 21
39.9%z 3.14 - 22
39.4%z 3.11 - 23
39.4%z 3.11 - 24
39.4%z 3.11 - 25
39.3%z 3.10 - 26
39.3%z 3.10 - 27
39.2%z 3.10 - 28
39.1%z 3.09 - 29
39%z 3.08 - 30
38.9%z 3.08 - 31
38.7%z 3.07 - 32
38.4%z 3.04 - 33
37.9%z 3.01 - 34
37.8%z 3.00 - 35
37.8%z 3.00 - 36
37.6%z 2.99 - 37
37.5%z 2.99 - 38
37.5%z 2.99 - 39
36.8%z 2.94 - 40
36.8%z 2.94 - 41
36.8%z 2.94 - 42
36.4%z 2.91 - 43
36.4%z 2.91 - 44
36.2%z 2.90 - 45
36.1%z 2.90 - 46
36.1%z 2.90 - 47
36.1%z 2.89 - 48
35.9%z 2.89 - 49
35.9%z 2.88 - 50
35.9%z 2.88