Ward Armstrong: raw computed results
The raw ranking from the production similarity calculation (face-embedding centroid cosine → gender-cohort z-normalization). The web-opinion crown, curation, and fusion re-rank are removed.
- 1
83.1%z 4.27 - 2
80.1%z 4.03 - 3
76.8%z 3.98 - 4
67.7%z 3.88 - 5
66.8%z 3.87 - 6
64.2%z 3.84 - 7
57.4%z 3.77 - 8
52.9%z 3.72 - 9
47.8%z 3.65 - 10
47.6%z 3.64 - 11
46.8%z 3.59 - 12
46.6%z 3.58 - 13
45.9%z 3.53 - 14
45%z 3.47 - 15
43.6%z 3.38 - 16
42.9%z 3.33 - 17
42.8%z 3.33 - 18
42.6%z 3.32 - 19
42.5%z 3.31 - 20
42.3%z 3.30 - 21
42.2%z 3.29 - 22
41.7%z 3.26 - 23
40.6%z 3.19 - 24
40.5%z 3.18 - 25
40.2%z 3.16 - 26
39.8%z 3.13 - 27
39.3%z 3.11 - 28
39.2%z 3.10 - 29
38.6%z 3.06 - 30
38.2%z 3.03 - 31
38%z 3.02 - 32
37.8%z 3.01 - 33
37.8%z 3.01 - 34
37.7%z 3.00 - 35
37.3%z 2.97 - 36
37.2%z 2.97 - 37
36.6%z 2.93 - 38
36.4%z 2.91 - 39
36.2%z 2.90 - 40
35.8%z 2.88 - 41
35.7%z 2.87 - 42
35.6%z 2.86 - 43
35.5%z 2.86 - 44
35.5%z 2.86 - 45
35.4%z 2.85 - 46
35.4%z 2.85 - 47
35.3%z 2.84 - 48
35%z 2.82 - 49
35%z 2.82 - 50
34.9%z 2.82