Adam Hills: raw computed results
The raw ranking from the production similarity calculation (face-embedding centroid cosine → gender-cohort z-normalization). The web-opinion crown, curation, and fusion re-rank are removed.
- 1
81.3%z 4.13 - 2
80.7%z 4.07 - 3
80.2%z 4.03 - 4
78.9%z 4.00 - 5
60.6%z 3.80 - 6
59.6%z 3.79 - 7
58.2%z 3.78 - 8
51.7%z 3.71 - 9
47.9%z 3.66 - 10
47.8%z 3.66 - 11
47.7%z 3.65 - 12
46.3%z 3.56 - 13
45.9%z 3.53 - 14
45.4%z 3.50 - 15
45.3%z 3.49 - 16
45.2%z 3.49 - 17
45.2%z 3.49 - 18
45.1%z 3.48 - 19
44.7%z 3.45 - 20
44.6%z 3.44 - 21
44.5%z 3.44 - 22
44.4%z 3.43 - 23
44.2%z 3.42 - 24
43.5%z 3.37 - 25
43.4%z 3.37 - 26
43.4%z 3.37 - 27
42.8%z 3.33 - 28
42.6%z 3.32 - 29
42.6%z 3.32 - 30
42.5%z 3.31 - 31
42.4%z 3.30 - 3242.3%z 3.30
- 33
42.2%z 3.29 - 34
42.1%z 3.28 - 35
42%z 3.28 - 36
41.7%z 3.26 - 37
41.2%z 3.23 - 38
41.1%z 3.22 - 39
41%z 3.22 - 40
40.8%z 3.20 - 41
40.4%z 3.17 - 42
40.2%z 3.16 - 43
40.1%z 3.16 - 44
40.1%z 3.16 - 45
39.8%z 3.13 - 46
39.4%z 3.11 - 47
39.3%z 3.10 - 48
38.9%z 3.08 - 49
38.8%z 3.07 - 50
38.7%z 3.07