Amanda Hearst: raw computed results
The raw ranking from the production similarity calculation (face-embedding centroid cosine → gender-cohort z-normalization). The web-opinion crown, curation, and fusion re-rank are removed.
- 1
90.2%z 4.88 - 2
87%z 4.59 - 3
82.9%z 4.25 - 4
77.8%z 3.99 - 5
74.1%z 3.95 - 6
70%z 3.91 - 7
53.2%z 3.72 - 8
52.6%z 3.72 - 9
51.2%z 3.70 - 10
48.8%z 3.68 - 11
48.5%z 3.67 - 12
47.9%z 3.66 - 13
47.3%z 3.62 - 14
47.1%z 3.61 - 15
45%z 3.47 - 16
44.7%z 3.45 - 17
43.6%z 3.38 - 18
43.4%z 3.37 - 19
43%z 3.34 - 20
42.9%z 3.33 - 21
42.3%z 3.29 - 22
41.6%z 3.25 - 23
41%z 3.21 - 24
40.9%z 3.21 - 25
40.9%z 3.20 - 26
40.8%z 3.20 - 27
40.7%z 3.19 - 28
40.3%z 3.17 - 29
40%z 3.15 - 30
39.6%z 3.13 - 31
39.5%z 3.12 - 32
39.4%z 3.11 - 33
39.4%z 3.11 - 34
39.4%z 3.11 - 35
39.3%z 3.10 - 36
39.2%z 3.09 - 37
39.2%z 3.09 - 38
39%z 3.08 - 39
38.9%z 3.08 - 40
38.9%z 3.07 - 41
38.8%z 3.07 - 42
38.6%z 3.06 - 43
38.5%z 3.05 - 44
38.3%z 3.04 - 45
38.2%z 3.03 - 46
38.1%z 3.02 - 47
38%z 3.02 - 48
38%z 3.02 - 49
37.8%z 3.01 - 50
37.6%z 2.99