Amber Michaels: raw computed results
The raw ranking from the production similarity calculation (face-embedding centroid cosine → gender-cohort z-normalization). The web-opinion crown, curation, and fusion re-rank are removed.
- 1
81.8%z 4.16 - 2
80.5%z 4.06 - 3
74.9%z 3.96 - 4
53.6%z 3.73 - 5
47.6%z 3.64 - 6
47.5%z 3.64 - 7
46.3%z 3.56 - 8
44.9%z 3.46 - 9
44.4%z 3.43 - 10
43.8%z 3.40 - 11
43.3%z 3.37 - 12
43.1%z 3.35 - 13
42.9%z 3.34 - 14
42.9%z 3.34 - 15
42.4%z 3.30 - 16
42.4%z 3.30 - 17
41.5%z 3.25 - 18
41.5%z 3.24 - 19
41.4%z 3.24 - 20
41.1%z 3.22 - 21
41%z 3.22 - 22
41%z 3.22 - 23
40.9%z 3.20 - 24
40.8%z 3.20 - 25
40.5%z 3.18 - 26
40.4%z 3.17 - 27
40.3%z 3.17 - 28
39.5%z 3.12 - 29
38.8%z 3.07 - 30
38.4%z 3.05 - 31
38.4%z 3.04 - 32
38.1%z 3.02 - 33
37.9%z 3.01 - 34
37.9%z 3.01 - 35
37.9%z 3.01 - 36
37.7%z 3.00 - 37
37.7%z 3.00 - 38
37.6%z 2.99 - 39
37.5%z 2.99 - 40
37.5%z 2.98 - 41
37.4%z 2.98 - 42
37.3%z 2.97 - 43
37.3%z 2.97 - 44
37.1%z 2.96 - 45
36.9%z 2.95 - 46
36.9%z 2.95 - 47
36.7%z 2.94 - 48
36.6%z 2.93 - 49
36%z 2.89 - 50
35.9%z 2.89