Andrew Cartmel: raw computed results
The raw ranking from the production similarity calculation (face-embedding centroid cosine → gender-cohort z-normalization). The web-opinion crown, curation, and fusion re-rank are removed.
- 1
87.4%z 4.62 - 2
86%z 4.51 - 3
81.3%z 4.12 - 4
74%z 3.95 - 5
66.5%z 3.87 - 6
55.2%z 3.75 - 7
47.6%z 3.64 - 8
46%z 3.54 - 9
43.2%z 3.36 - 10
42.7%z 3.32 - 11
42.4%z 3.30 - 12
42%z 3.28 - 13
41.8%z 3.26 - 14
41.6%z 3.25 - 15
41.2%z 3.23 - 16
41.1%z 3.22 - 17
41%z 3.21 - 18
40.7%z 3.19 - 19
40.5%z 3.18 - 20
40.1%z 3.15 - 21
40%z 3.15 - 22
40%z 3.15 - 23
39.8%z 3.14 - 24
39.8%z 3.13 - 25
39.3%z 3.10 - 26
39.1%z 3.09 - 27
39.1%z 3.09 - 28
38.9%z 3.08 - 29
38.8%z 3.07 - 30
38.6%z 3.06 - 31
38.6%z 3.05 - 32
38.4%z 3.04 - 33
38.1%z 3.03 - 34
38.1%z 3.03 - 35
38%z 3.02 - 36
37.8%z 3.01 - 37
37.7%z 3.00 - 38
37.7%z 3.00 - 39
37.5%z 2.99 - 40
37.4%z 2.98 - 41
37.4%z 2.98 - 42
37.2%z 2.96 - 43
37.2%z 2.96 - 44
37%z 2.96 - 45
36.9%z 2.95 - 46
36.8%z 2.94 - 47
36.7%z 2.94 - 48
36.7%z 2.93 - 49
36.7%z 2.93