Cao Hamburger: raw computed results
The raw ranking from the production similarity calculation (face-embedding centroid cosine → gender-cohort z-normalization). The web-opinion crown, curation, and fusion re-rank are removed.
- 1
84.6%z 4.39 - 2
84.2%z 4.36 - 3
81.9%z 4.17 - 4
71.6%z 3.93 - 5
69.3%z 3.90 - 6
67.5%z 3.88 - 7
63.6%z 3.84 - 8
51.7%z 3.71 - 9
47.2%z 3.61 - 10
46.7%z 3.58 - 11
46.2%z 3.55 - 12
44.2%z 3.42 - 13
43.8%z 3.40 - 14
43.4%z 3.37 - 15
43%z 3.35 - 16
42.9%z 3.34 - 17
42.5%z 3.31 - 18
42.2%z 3.29 - 19
42.2%z 3.29 - 20
42.1%z 3.29 - 21
41.9%z 3.27 - 22
41%z 3.21 - 23
40.5%z 3.18 - 24
40.2%z 3.16 - 25
40.1%z 3.15 - 26
39.7%z 3.13 - 27
39.5%z 3.12 - 28
38.7%z 3.06 - 29
38.5%z 3.05 - 30
38.5%z 3.05 - 31
38.3%z 3.04 - 32
37.3%z 2.97 - 33
37.1%z 2.96 - 34
37%z 2.96 - 35
37%z 2.96 - 36
36.7%z 2.93 - 37
36.5%z 2.92 - 38
36.4%z 2.92 - 39
36.4%z 2.91 - 40
36.3%z 2.91 - 41
36.2%z 2.90 - 42
35.5%z 2.86 - 43
35.3%z 2.84 - 44
35.1%z 2.83 - 45
35.1%z 2.83 - 46
35%z 2.83 - 47
35%z 2.83 - 48
34.9%z 2.82 - 49
34.9%z 2.82 - 50
34.7%z 2.81