Chandler Canterbury: raw computed results
The raw ranking from the production similarity calculation (face-embedding centroid cosine → gender-cohort z-normalization). The web-opinion crown, curation, and fusion re-rank are removed.
- 1
88.9%z 4.75 - 2
86.6%z 4.55 - 3
84.2%z 4.36 - 4
83%z 4.26 - 5
80.4%z 4.05 - 6
80.2%z 4.04 - 7
78.6%z 4.00 - 8
58.7%z 3.78 - 9
56.5%z 3.76 - 10
50.2%z 3.69 - 11
49.6%z 3.68 - 12
47.8%z 3.66 - 13
47.3%z 3.62 - 14
47.2%z 3.61 - 15
47.1%z 3.61 - 16
46.8%z 3.59 - 17
46.6%z 3.58 - 18
46.3%z 3.55 - 19
45.3%z 3.49 - 20
45.1%z 3.48 - 21
44.7%z 3.45 - 22
44.1%z 3.41 - 23
44%z 3.41 - 24
43.9%z 3.40 - 25
43.7%z 3.39 - 26
43.2%z 3.35 - 27
43.2%z 3.35 - 28
42.8%z 3.33 - 29
42.8%z 3.33 - 30
42.6%z 3.32 - 31
42.2%z 3.29 - 32
42.2%z 3.29 - 33
42%z 3.28 - 34
41.9%z 3.27 - 35
41.8%z 3.26 - 36
41.7%z 3.26 - 37
41.6%z 3.25 - 38
41.6%z 3.25 - 39
41.5%z 3.25 - 40
41.3%z 3.23 - 41
41.3%z 3.23 - 42
41.2%z 3.22 - 43
40.9%z 3.21 - 44
40.9%z 3.21 - 45
40.9%z 3.20 - 46
40.6%z 3.19 - 47
40.5%z 3.18 - 48
40.5%z 3.18 - 49
40.4%z 3.17 - 50
40%z 3.15