Chris Boardman: raw computed results
The raw ranking from the production similarity calculation (face-embedding centroid cosine → gender-cohort z-normalization). The web-opinion crown, curation, and fusion re-rank are removed.
- 1
83.1%z 4.27 - 2
82.8%z 4.25 - 3
64.3%z 3.84 - 4
56.2%z 3.76 - 5
56%z 3.75 - 6
55.2%z 3.74 - 7
51.1%z 3.70 - 8
48.4%z 3.67 - 9
47.9%z 3.66 - 10
47.7%z 3.65 - 11
47.5%z 3.63 - 12
46.4%z 3.56 - 13
46.1%z 3.54 - 14
45.9%z 3.53 - 15
45.1%z 3.48 - 16
45.1%z 3.48 - 17
45%z 3.47 - 18
44.3%z 3.43 - 19
44.1%z 3.41 - 20
43.8%z 3.40 - 21
43.7%z 3.39 - 22
43.5%z 3.37 - 23
42.6%z 3.31 - 24
42.1%z 3.29 - 25
42%z 3.28 - 26
41.9%z 3.27 - 27
41.8%z 3.27 - 28
41.2%z 3.23 - 29
41%z 3.21 - 30
40.9%z 3.21 - 31
40.9%z 3.20 - 32
40.8%z 3.20 - 33
40.7%z 3.20 - 34
40.6%z 3.19 - 35
40.4%z 3.17 - 36
40.3%z 3.17 - 37
40.2%z 3.16 - 38
40.1%z 3.15 - 39
39.9%z 3.14 - 40
39.8%z 3.13 - 41
39.4%z 3.11 - 42
39.2%z 3.10 - 43
39%z 3.08 - 44
38.8%z 3.07 - 45
38.4%z 3.05 - 46
38.3%z 3.04 - 47
37.8%z 3.00 - 48
37.7%z 3.00 - 49
37.6%z 2.99 - 50
37.4%z 2.98