Chris Harms: raw computed results
The raw ranking from the production similarity calculation (face-embedding centroid cosine → gender-cohort z-normalization). The web-opinion crown, curation, and fusion re-rank are removed.
- 1
91.2%z 5.06 - 2
90.8%z 4.98 - 3
85.7%z 4.48 - 4
82.1%z 4.19 - 5
81.9%z 4.17 - 6
81.5%z 4.14 - 7
80.9%z 4.09 - 8
80.6%z 4.06 - 9
75.8%z 3.97 - 10
75.3%z 3.97 - 11
69.3%z 3.90 - 12
66.7%z 3.87 - 13
63.9%z 3.84 - 14
61.9%z 3.82 - 15
51%z 3.70 - 16
50.1%z 3.69 - 17
47.8%z 3.65 - 18
47.7%z 3.64 - 19
47.6%z 3.64 - 20
47.1%z 3.61 - 21
46.9%z 3.59 - 22
46.5%z 3.57 - 23
46.1%z 3.55 - 24
46%z 3.53 - 25
45.8%z 3.53 - 26
45.8%z 3.52 - 27
45.7%z 3.51 - 28
44.2%z 3.42 - 29
43.4%z 3.37 - 30
43.3%z 3.36 - 31
43.3%z 3.36 - 32
42.9%z 3.34 - 33
42.9%z 3.33 - 34
42.4%z 3.30 - 35
42.3%z 3.30 - 36
42%z 3.28 - 37
41.9%z 3.27 - 38
41.9%z 3.27 - 39
41.9%z 3.27 - 40
41.7%z 3.26 - 41
41.5%z 3.24 - 42
41.3%z 3.23 - 43
41.1%z 3.22 - 44
41%z 3.21 - 45
40.9%z 3.21 - 46
40.8%z 3.20 - 47
40.5%z 3.18 - 48
39.9%z 3.14 - 49
39.9%z 3.14 - 50
39.8%z 3.13