Clarence Thomas: raw computed results
The raw ranking from the production similarity calculation (face-embedding centroid cosine → gender-cohort z-normalization). The web-opinion crown, curation, and fusion re-rank are removed.
- 1
87.7%z 4.64 - 2
64.2%z 3.84 - 3
59.1%z 3.79 - 4
57.2%z 3.77 - 5
49.5%z 3.68 - 6
46.8%z 3.59 - 7
46.3%z 3.56 - 8
46.1%z 3.54 - 9
45.3%z 3.49 - 10
44.8%z 3.46 - 11
44.7%z 3.45 - 12
43.3%z 3.36 - 13
42.7%z 3.32 - 14
42.6%z 3.31 - 15
42.5%z 3.31 - 16
42.5%z 3.31 - 17
42.2%z 3.29 - 18
42.1%z 3.29 - 19
42%z 3.28 - 20
42%z 3.28 - 21
41.8%z 3.26 - 22
41.6%z 3.25 - 23
41.4%z 3.24 - 24
41.3%z 3.23 - 25
41%z 3.21 - 26
40.9%z 3.21 - 27
40.2%z 3.16 - 28
40%z 3.15 - 29
40%z 3.15 - 30
39.8%z 3.14 - 31
39.4%z 3.11 - 32
39.3%z 3.11 - 33
39.3%z 3.10 - 34
39.2%z 3.09 - 35
39.1%z 3.09 - 36
38.9%z 3.08 - 37
38.9%z 3.08 - 38
38.8%z 3.07 - 39
38.5%z 3.05 - 40
38.5%z 3.05 - 41
38.4%z 3.05 - 42
38%z 3.02 - 43
37.7%z 3.00 - 44
37.5%z 2.99 - 45
37.4%z 2.98 - 46
37.3%z 2.97 - 47
37.1%z 2.96 - 48
36.9%z 2.94 - 49
36.8%z 2.94 - 50
36.3%z 2.91