Clement Virgo: raw computed results
The raw ranking from the production similarity calculation (face-embedding centroid cosine → gender-cohort z-normalization). The web-opinion crown, curation, and fusion re-rank are removed.
- 1
81.5%z 4.14 - 2
81.4%z 4.13 - 3
80.8%z 4.08 - 4
70.5%z 3.91 - 5
62.5%z 3.83 - 6
52.1%z 3.71 - 7
46.1%z 3.55 - 8
45.7%z 3.52 - 9
45.2%z 3.48 - 10
44.9%z 3.46 - 11
44.6%z 3.45 - 12
44.5%z 3.44 - 13
43.5%z 3.37 - 14
42.8%z 3.33 - 15
42.5%z 3.31 - 16
42.2%z 3.29 - 17
42.1%z 3.28 - 18
42%z 3.28 - 19
41.5%z 3.25 - 20
41.5%z 3.24 - 21
41.4%z 3.24 - 22
41.2%z 3.23 - 23
40.9%z 3.20 - 24
40.8%z 3.20 - 25
40.5%z 3.18 - 26
40.4%z 3.17 - 27
40.3%z 3.17 - 28
40.3%z 3.16 - 29
39.9%z 3.14 - 30
39.6%z 3.12 - 31
39.6%z 3.12 - 32
39.2%z 3.10 - 33
39.2%z 3.10 - 34
38.8%z 3.07 - 35
38.6%z 3.06 - 36
38.5%z 3.05 - 37
37.8%z 3.01 - 38
37.7%z 3.00 - 39
37.7%z 3.00 - 40
37.7%z 3.00 - 41
37.6%z 2.99 - 42
37.5%z 2.98 - 43
37.4%z 2.98 - 44
37.3%z 2.97 - 45
37.3%z 2.97 - 46
37.1%z 2.96 - 47
37%z 2.96 - 48
36.9%z 2.95 - 49
36.8%z 2.94 - 50
36.7%z 2.93