Cress Williams: raw computed results
The raw ranking from the production similarity calculation (face-embedding centroid cosine → gender-cohort z-normalization). The web-opinion crown, curation, and fusion re-rank are removed.
- 1
85%z 4.42 - 2
83.9%z 4.33 - 3
82.6%z 4.23 - 4
81.5%z 4.14 - 5
81.5%z 4.14 - 6
71%z 3.92 - 7
67.5%z 3.88 - 8
57.8%z 3.77 - 9
55.6%z 3.75 - 10
50.3%z 3.69 - 11
47.6%z 3.64 - 12
47.2%z 3.62 - 13
46.4%z 3.57 - 14
46%z 3.54 - 15
45.6%z 3.51 - 16
45%z 3.47 - 17
44.6%z 3.45 - 18
44.3%z 3.43 - 19
44.3%z 3.43 - 20
44.1%z 3.41 - 21
43.6%z 3.38 - 22
43.3%z 3.36 - 23
43.1%z 3.35 - 24
43.1%z 3.35 - 25
42.7%z 3.32 - 26
42.4%z 3.30 - 27
42.2%z 3.29 - 28
41.9%z 3.27 - 29
41.8%z 3.27 - 30
41.8%z 3.26 - 31
41.7%z 3.26 - 32
41.6%z 3.25 - 33
41.3%z 3.23 - 34
41.2%z 3.23 - 35
41.2%z 3.22 - 36
41.1%z 3.22 - 37
41.1%z 3.22 - 38
41%z 3.21 - 39
40.8%z 3.20 - 40
40.8%z 3.20 - 41
40.8%z 3.20 - 42
40.5%z 3.18 - 43
40.4%z 3.17 - 44
40.2%z 3.16 - 45
40%z 3.15 - 46
39.9%z 3.14 - 47
39.9%z 3.14 - 48
39.8%z 3.13 - 49
39.8%z 3.13 - 50
39.4%z 3.11